Family sues driver, companies in fatal crash

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Tasha Kates

Published: October 21, 2008

The family of a 16-year-old Albemarle High School junior killed in a car accident has filed a $15 million lawsuit against a tractor-trailer driver and the company for which he worked.

Clinton and Michele Aichs, parents of Sydney Aichs, filed the suit against Kenneth Barbour earlier this month, according to court documents filed in Albemarle County Circuit Court. The suit also names Don B. Swisher Trucking Corp. and McCann Delivery Service Inc.
“Mr. and Mrs. Aichs were forced to file this lawsuit because the defendants have refused to fully accept responsibility for their acts and omissions in the days before, and of course the day of, Sydney’s death,” wrote J. Gregory Webb, the Aichs’s attorney, in an e-mail. “The Aichs are seeking justice through the only means provided to them.”

Early in the morning on May 9, Sydney Aichs was making a left turn onto U.S. 29 from Ashwood Boulevard. Authorities have said Barbour failed to stop for a red light, hitting Aichs’s car with his tractor-trailer. She was pronounced dead soon after the accident. Barbour, 55, was indicted in June in Albemarle Circuit Court on charges of involuntary manslaughter and reckless driving.
The Aichs’s lawsuit claims that Barbour, a Waynesboro man who drove the night shift for Swisher, didn’t slow down May 9 when the traffic light turned yellow on U.S. 29. Instead, Barbour kept going through the light without braking or honking his horn, the suit said, ultimately hitting the driver’s side of Aichs’s 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Barbour could not be reached for comment for this story. Webb said the Aichs family also declined to comment.
The lawsuit also claims that the brakes on Barbour’s tractor weren’t in service, something that he was supposed to have checked during the pre-trip inspection required by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. According to the suit, Barbour also drove for the company while he was “ill and/or fatigued, or while his ability or alertness was so impaired as to cause his operation of the tractor-trailer to be unsafe and hazardous to other motorists …”
Swisher and McCann are accused of failing to maintain their equipment and of failing to train and supervise Barbour under the suit. The document also makes mention of federal violations against the companies, which included failing to conduct post-accident alcohol testing on Barbour and for failing to mark a commercial motor vehicle with a legal name and/or a U.S. Department of Transportation identification number.

A Don B. Swisher Trucking Corp. spokeswoman said Tuesday that the Staunton-based company is prohibited from commenting on the lawsuit.
The Aichses are alleging negligence against Barbour and both companies. In addition to seeking $15 million in compensatory damages from all three parties, the family is requesting $350,000 in punitive damages from Barbour.
Webb said the Aichs family has suffered greatly as a result of Sydney Aichs’s death.

“I cannot adequately express in words what they’ve lost,” Webb said. “It was just a senseless, awful, horrific tragedy.”
The fatal accident triggered a review of the intersection by the Virginia Department of Transportation in early July. According to the agency’s report, there were 102 crashes at that intersection from 2003 to 2007. None of the crashes was fatal, but 47 people were injured in those accidents.
According to VDOT, the U.S. 29-Ashwood Boulevard intersection ranks third in Albemarle County for the number of fatal and injurious accidents from 2004 to 2006.

The speed limit on U.S. 29 between Polo Grounds Road and Airport Road was reduced in July from 55 mph to 45 mph. The Forest Lakes Community Association also has shifted back the subdivision’s entrance sign so that drivers have better visibility of oncoming traffic.
Barbour is scheduled for trial Feb. 11 in Albemarle Circuit Court on his criminal charges. Webb said a trial date for the civil suit hasn’t been set, but he hopes to get a two-day jury trial set for the latter half of 2009.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( firehunter24 ) on October 28, 2008 at 6:31 am

I still firmly believe that the quick changing light at the intersection was partially at fault.
I had one friend that did not agree with my light theory. I took her for a drive up 29 past the intersection. She was in shock on how fast the light changed from green to red.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( disbelief ) on October 26, 2008 at 2:44 pm

First off, my prayers and sympathies go out to Sydney’s family. No parent should have to bury their child—especially from such a tragic, preventable event such as this.

Secondly, while there are a few who are saying it is wrong to sue—I disagree. It may take a financial loss such as this to get the company to make sure it’s drivers are fully aware of what they need to do BEFORE EVERY RUN. To be vigilant on the road and follow the rules. Stop when they are fatigued. Above all else, consider safety before all else.

It may also be that Sydney’s family will do something positive with the proceeds of the lawsuit, such as create a trust fund in memory of their daughter. They are no ‘being greedy’, I can guarantee that given the chance, they would give up every thing they have to get their daughter back—but thsoe of you who are hawking about the lawsuit are too resentful to comprehend what they are going through.

In closing, again, my prayers for Syd’s family.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bjackson ) on October 25, 2008 at 7:19 pm

It seems like every time something happens, it is always sue, sue, sue. Lots of money seems to be the answer to everything. How about PRAYING!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Emily17 ) on October 23, 2008 at 2:51 pm

If steps could have been taken prior to the accident to protect other drivers but weren’t, it is obvious that the company values money over human life. Suing the company is a way to hit the company where it hurts: their wallet. It may even make other companies think twice about their policies and the corners they cut to save a few bucks. I truly believe that is the purpose of the case, not to try to bring Sydney back or heal the pain of her loss, but to make sure she did not die in vain.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Kaligrm ) on October 22, 2008 at 3:51 pm

This is so very tragic but I don’t think suing anyone is going to make it any better.  I suspect that Mr. Barbour is suffering tremendously.  We need to pray that everyone involved can get some peace.  Dragging it through court is just going to make it harder for everybody.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Buzzorn ) on October 22, 2008 at 2:43 pm

Now who couldn’t see this coming. I hope the $15million is everything the parents need to get over this tragic accident. Like the other posters, it’s not going to bring their child back. Maybe they will use the money for a scholarship in their child’s name.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Trish ) on October 22, 2008 at 1:38 pm

Justice will be served in the courts. It seems to me VDOT bears some responsibility. I would find it very hard to spend money gained as a result of my childs death. Lawsuits aren’t always the solution.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( t-bird ) on October 22, 2008 at 8:25 am

So if the intersection was viewed as unsafe than why sue the driver and the company? why not sue VDOT?Or better yet why sue at all it’s not going to bring her back. Or is having millions of dollars make you feel better?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Special Reports
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement