Goode, Perriello spar over oil

By Brian McNeill

Published: August 13, 2008

The two candidates vying for the 5th congressional district seat faced off Wednesday in a vinegary quasi-debate, the first of the campaign season.

Six-term incumbent U.S. Rep. Virgil H. Goode Jr., R-Rocky Mount, and challenger Tom Perriello, a Democrat and national security consultant from Ivy, outlined their views for an hour and a half in front of 350 people at the Senior Center on Pepsi Place.

Goode, 61, repeatedly told the crowd that he wants Congress to remove a federal ban on drilling for oil and natural gas in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge and on the outer continental shelf.

“It is a way to have an immediate, positive impact on the price of oil,” Goode said.

A few supporters started to applaud Goode’s “pro-drill” agenda, but they were promptly drowned out by widespread booing.

Throughout the forum, Goode reiterated his call for domestic oil drilling, even when asked seemingly unrelated questions.

When asked about his views on global warming, Goode said that he supports energy independence, brought about by tax credits for alternative energy research and by more oil drilling in America.

When asked his thoughts about the conflict between Russia and Georgia, Goode suggested that America could learn a lesson from Russia, which set out to become energy self-sufficient when the Soviet Union fell. If the United States followed suit and drilled for oil within its own territory, he said, it would put America in a stronger negotiating position with Russia.

Perriello, 33, said he too supports offshore drilling, though he is hesitant about drilling in Alaska. He also supports expansion of nuclear power and alternative energy research. However, he added that there is no “quick fix” that will bring down the price of gas or make America energy independent. It will take a comprehensive approach, he said, including higher fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles.

The energy crisis, Perriello said, is the nation’s biggest threat, but it can also be the country’s most lucrative opportunity. In the coming years, he said, there will be an economic shift, similar to the dot-com boom, in which companies will produce new energy technology. Such a shift, he said, could create new jobs in Virginia.

If drilling for oil is at the center of Goode’s re-election bid, at the center of Perriello’s campaign are the issues of jobs and economic relief.

Perriello recently wrapped up an “economic revival” tour of the 5th District’s 22 counties and municipalities. On the tour, Perriello presented his economic platform, which includes expanded work-force training, tax breaks for small businesses and investment in infrastructure such as rail and broadband.

In his opening remarks, Perriello — who co-founded two faith-based nonprofits and has sought to end such conflicts as the genocide in Darfur — told the crowd of mostly senior citizens that he was inspired to pursue community service by his grandfather. “He taught me that everyone is responsible for themselves, but it’s what you do for your community and country that defines you,” he said.

The Senior Statesmen of Virginia sponsored the candidate forum. Perriello said he was also inspired by one of the group’s longtime members, the late former Del. Mitchell Van Yahres, D-Charlottesville. Perriello was a page in the General Assembly when he was in eighth grade. Van Yahres “was the first person who showed me that you can enter politics and hold onto your integrity and continue to be a straight talker.”

Wednesday’s candidate forum was not intended to be a debate. The two candidates offered an opening and closing statement and fielded questions from the audience. However, Goode and Perriello essentially debated each issue regardless of the format.

Perriello said the nation is ready to step up to its challenges, but it needs leaders. Much like the “Greatest Generation” was challenged to fight in World War II, Perriello said, his generation is tasked with making the nation energy independent, halting the spread of terrorism, balancing the federal budget and keeping the country competitive in the global economy. “These are problems that we can solve,” he said. “But we’ve been let down year after year after year by the people in Washington.”

Goode pooh-poohed Perriello’s call to service.

“Vague generalities will not win the day in Washington, D.C.,” Goode said. “You’ve got to work with concrete proposals with specifics.”

Goode warned that a Barack Obama-led government — of which Perriello aims to be a part — would bring about massive tax increases. He said that proponents of Obama’s policies are “mush heads.”

Both candidates were asked their views on earmarks, which are spending items that congress members can insert into bills, usually benefiting an entity in their district. Goode said he wants to end earmarks, but added that his earmarks have benefited the Jefferson Area Board for Aging, the University of Virginia and others. Perriello said that earmarks will probably never go away and that he could get more for the district, as he would likely be a member of the majority party.

The two were also asked if they would vote to keep the tax cuts implemented during President Bush’s administration. Perriello said he disagreed with all of Bush’s tax cuts, with the exception of the recent economic stimulus package, which he said benefited the middle class. Goode said he supports the current tax structure, adding that he did not vote in favor of the economic stimulus bill because it cost $152 billion.